the fucking moon | blogjam

the fucking moon

New on blogjam: Neil Armstrong.

1060 Comments so far
Leave a comment

That is the funniest god-damned thing I’ve ever seen on the internet. You win, we’re all packing it in and going home.

Hooray!

That may have saved me tonight.

That’s what I would have said instead of the cheesy ‘one step for man’ bollocks. LOL

That’s the funniest thing on the fucking internet.

Can I just say “fuck” again?

So they did go there! There was me thinking it was a great con and it was filmed in the studio.

Absolutely brilliant! Nice one.

This was fucking ripped of word for word from The Onion:
the ECC needs to come up with their own original shit.

Praise Dobbs! I knew it…KNEW IT.

You people think this is FUNNY?! It’s the TRUTH, the fucking TRUTH!

Zaphod - the ECC track is from an album called “Plagiarism Nation” which fully credits its original source - the Onion’s audio book Our dumb Century.

I loved it! Would be even funnier if they found something there like a movie set prop or an alien??!!!

LMAO Cocko. I can just see it. “Holy mother of god, we are walking on the fucking moo… Hey, what the fuck was that? Shit! It’s Spielberg behind that fucking moon rock! Uh, Houston, we have a problem…”

If he had the word FUCK ,one more time………….!

Fuck…. the only other word that is as brilliant as the word cunt.
Ah.

The funiest thing on the internet but it would of been even funnyer if he would of found a prop on the set.

why all the need for swearing? how can u make such a miraculous event seem so casual? it was awesome ok jeeeeesh

Sorry to disappoint you, folks. Didn’t happen like this at all whatsoever. Mr. Armstrong never used such offensive language then, nor has he ever spoken that way. Not ever. This is a shameless degradation of a timeless historical event and no one has a right to butcher it. Shame on you all.

Thankfully, Americans have the right to degrade it. It says so in our constitution.

Having a right, and exercising it responsibly, are two different things. The party that modifed these historical artifacts, exercised their freedom of speech in an irresponsible and self-agrandising way, and is quite obviously a real fuckhead.

i think even if u didnt normally use the word FUCK…u would when you landed on the moon! funny but more real than what they tried to make us think was said..loved it!!

You’re a silly billy, stomki. It’s a joke.

And when you think about it, the moon landing was a bit silly and pointless too.

I’m glad he didn’t said, he guys i found a note KILLROY WAS HERE.

Flash Sux.

Don’t believe it in the least. Looks so fake! Sounds super fake but deffinately funny!

That was utterly digusting and shameful to make such a mocery out of history.

What’s a mocery?

absolutely hilarious

utterly disgusting and shameful?
come on, you american, LAFF, will ya?

Get a life.

Some of us would welcome a cross-nation revival of the space exploration program. Just because we won’t see it on our life times doesn’t mean we can make ‘limp-penis’ stabs at other peoples endeavours.

Yanks, they can all fuck off back to the back side of Kentucky, marry they’re mothers, and raise kids even futher retarded than they’re over weight - under educated parents.

for a second there u had me fooled then my medication wore off and i started laughing again at how fake it was? utterly fake but highly amusing none the less!!

I hope this is real…because it is TOO FUCKING COOL!

fuck, where the hell you?ve got it from?
:-)

I am fucking not impressed…

Are we sure that nasa didn’t send Ozzy to the moon? Holy fuck i’m on the fuckin moon. SHARON!!! your not going to believe this. i’m on the fucking moon. holy fuck, i need some booze, and pills, holy fucking shit.

not only fuck but i just pissed myself if it had been me

Before the internet I was blissfully unaware of the large percentage of people who are idiots. Funtional, and capable of posting in a comment section, but blazing imbeciles just the same.This saddens me.
The audio is a joke, and a very good one at that.

Mr. Armstrong would never use the Lords name in vain and shame on all you for doing this. Jesus is not a swear word you fuckin assholes, oh wait assholes are usefull,pieces of fucking shit fuckers ass licking inbread mother fucking dick warts….

What is wrong with you people? How can such vile stuff be placed on the information highway? There are children who can find and view this…My goodness….Are you FUCKING nuts ?

HAHA ABOUT TIME I HEARD THE FUCKING TRUTH… STOP WHINGING YOU WHORES! Its a good laugh and i guess people like you would be saying.. ohhh fiddledee dee where on the moon! ohh goodey! Give me a break you numbnutz!

You know this the truth. What would you have said?

1. EVERYBODY knows it didn’t happen this way.
2. It’s not meant to be serious. It’s just for laughs nothing less nothing more. There’s no hidden message or intentions.
3. There’s not the intention to hurt or harm anyone - not even God - in particular. I think Neil and Buzz themselves would find this highly amusing.
4. You think this is serious stuff children shouldn’t see? Guess you overlooked all the hardcore porn sites and stuff like rotten.com that’s scattered all over the Net and pop-up even if you surf to google.com.

LMAO!

LOL!

It’s even fucking funnier to hear when the whole world except America knows that there never was a landing on the moon. Haha!! And even laughable when gullible Americans believe in governement propaganda.

IM NOT SURE I BELIVE THIS CAUSE AT THAT TIME ALOT OF THOSE PEOPLE DIDNT SWEAR VERY MUCH AND MAYBE ONCE AS THEY GOT TO THE MOON BUT OVER AND OVER ..PEOPLE JUST DIDNT DO THAT THEN EVEN WITH THAT GOING ON …

I HAVE MET AND SPOKEN WITH NEIL ARMSTRONG I AM SURE HE WOULD SPELL FUCKIN,,PHUCKIN THEREFORE HE DOESN’T KNOW HE’S SWEARING

Finally, the truth is told!

Yankees! On the moon! However did they get in?

Only stupid Americans could find this kind of crap amusing….

Brilliant!! Jesus H Christ in a chicken basket!

Well Fraser, this comment section is turning into a right little forum.

For those that don’t find this funny, then fuck off back to writing letters of complaints to the ITC and Mary Whitehouse about “too much swearing on television”.

For those that find this a slight on the American nation, I think I can safely assume you have never travelled outwith the American borders. Get a life and a plane ticket.

For those (like me) that find this absolutely piss-wet funny, then lets join in unison and shout “Hoopla! Hoorah for Fraser, he rocks!”

Another Blogjam production of utter internet genius !

Holy mother of`- fuck?? :-) …But I still don?t belive that they actually ever were on the moon..

Regards from Sweden, Bor

well fuckin funny

Ok, everyone else give up - it doesn’t get any funnier than this.

Jesus H. Christ in a chicken bucket, that was a hoot! I always thought the original transmission was a little stilted; about fuckin’ time we heard the real deal. Keep up the good work.

Hmmm. it is funny but it was funnier in my head before I actually heard the audio (I guess the blame/credit for the audio recoring, the performance that is, goes to the Onion? Do I understand that correctly?).

I read that piece in an Onion book and since much of it was written in ALLCAPS my mental version of the audio included much more enthusiasm and HOLY SHITness. The audio was a rather droll performance lacking all the amusing HOLY SHITness that would contrast with the actual moon landing audio.

Wow weee…I know that’s the real deal footage & audio because my mates’s mate was there when it happened…holy mother that’s top secret stuff. You should not have got hold of that, those guys at cucumber will get in trouble for sure now.

Holy Fucking Shit HAHAHAHA That was so awsome. I can’t believe that yall can’t take a joke. Jesus H. Christ in a Fuckin Chicken Basket. OMG I can’t stop laughing.

Laughed my ass off dude..
I like it more than that crappy idea that they never really landed on the moon.. (the shadows are pointing the wrong way and all that stuff a few years ago).
This is much more believable..! I was there! I should know!!! (saw it on telly age 11 so it must be true.. it always was a jerky sound track but I naively put that down to the moon being “a long way away”).

Ok, so picture this…. 10 years from now, first landing on Mars….

“Houston, can you believe we are on Mars… yes, we have landed on Mars…. bollocks fuck cunt asshole twat shitbox dickface asswipe shiteating cocksucker fuckwit rimjob cock cock cock…. over”

There was no image or sound after the completion of download. Thought you might want to know…

holy shit dood

can I have permission to use that on the radio ?

Too fucking slow

holey fucking h. christ that was funnier than my basket case mom!

wow the fucking moon was the like funniest movie i have ever heard and seen. thanks

Class

funny funny shit why do people without a sense of humor bother viewing these things tho? is it just so they can complain?

thats was great loved it

Fucking funny. Please do not EVER take this off your site. I usually never laughed out loud looking at this type of crap. But this is hysterical!!!!

oh my fucking god, that was the funniest shit ever

i watched it like 39 times ina row hahahahaa

WHY THE BAD FOUR LETTER WORDS!??????

Jesus H. Christ! I DO communications for NASA and that was the absolutely funniest fucking thing I’ve heard. They did a great job recreating the true sound of the event.

Now, onto fucking Mars in a chicken basket!

It’s just FUCKING BRILLIANT

Holy living fuck! That is one of the most hilarious things I’ve ever fucking seen, over.

OMG WTF HE SIAD FUCK A MILLON TMIES LOL ROTFLAMO TAHT TEH FUNNEYSETY SHIT EVAR!!!11!1 IN TEH MOON TTOO! LOL!!1 HE SIAD IT LIEK ‘FUCK FUCK FUCKING FUKC FKUC;”‘ JSUT LIEK WEHN I WAS AG E 35 IN HI SCOOL I LOOOKE UP TEH DIKTONAREY AND FUOND TEH WORD FUCK ADN IW AS LIKE “OMG LOLLOLOLOL WTF TEH HI SCOOL DIKTONARY SED IT SIAD FUCK ISSO FUNNEY OMG OMGOMGOMSADFKLJSAEIORJFACSD1!1231

Oh, wait a minute. Nevermind.
I’m sorry, but that Neil Armstrong parody was horribly unfunny.

Not unfunny in a “hay guys you suck for making fun of a historic milestone” way, but more like a “that shit sucks you fag” kind of unfunny.

Jesus Christ, If I wanted to see the hilarity from a ridiculously bad diagnosis of tourette syndrome, i’d go visit Cliff Yablonski off Appleton City, just for the simple difference that his usage of the word ‘fuck’ is actually funnier than yours.

I suggest you do so too, because maybe he’d school you in the teachings of funny by fucking kick your fucking unfunny ass and fucking run you fucking over with his fucking chrysler. Because, you know, you fucking wasted my fucking time, and you’ll probably fucking waste his fucking time too, you fucking fucktard.

That was funny as FUCK!!!!!!

I am a senior senior citizen and I am here to tell you all that we had a
“Harvest Moon” and a “Blue Moon” far too damn long.

Thanks from the bottom of my heart to the man who has now given as a “Fucking Moon” I always knew that someday someone would come
along and turn that moon into something useful. Imagine if you will

It FUCKING makes me laugh EVERY time I look at it

Can someone tell me what the name is of the font used for the text “Neil armstrong / the awful truth”

thanx!!!!!

Incredible. I always wondered why Armstrong was so cool about it - that’s why I had my suspicions about it all. These new revelations put a whole new light on the moon landings. Now I trylu believe that they happened.

The font used is the Space age font from this page.

load of shite

So i beleiving this, does it mean they really did land on the “fucken moon”

so funny I laughed…oh you Americans…you are so funny!!!

i wish that would have been aired lived. the fucking moon…hmph. i love neil more now.

I don’t FUCKING beleive it for a minute.

It would be really cool to go to the moon and swear in one sixth gravity I would take a dump in a crater as well.
The moon is overated and only makes people go crazy that where the word lunatic comes from.

An away team using such language would not be logical unless of course they were humans, probally the least logical of know intelligent species.

FUCK!

Moronic. I bet you guys do line dancing as well.

HOLY FUCKIN SHIT IS RIGHT…NOW, THAT’S MORE LIKE IT!

HOLY FUCKIN SHIT IS RIGHT…NOW, THAT’S MORE LIKE IT!

hilarious-but it’s too bad a lot of f***heads will believe this. ahhh…the x-files generation

I knew it! I FUCKING KNEW IT!

A couple of scary comments from some visitors, though. If you believe it — and it looks like you do in spots — then you deserve to be offended. Fuck you. Hahahahahahahahahaha

That was great. It is about time we got the real story on the first moonwalk. do you have any other unedited footage?

lol that was great :D and lol at the peopole who thought it was real and even more lol at the people who moaned about it. gg wp made me smile :)

Terrible

Terrible

That was fucking funny!

LOL!! I just sent it to Neil and he cant stop laughing.

Holy, fucking shit, if it is on the internet, it must be true.

thats truly unfucking believable!!!!!!!!!! ;-)

The EAGLE has LANDED

THE ACTUAL FIRST WORDS ARE NOT ON YOUR TAPE…..”MOTHER H FUCKER, MAY MY DICK FIND MY ASS IF I AM LYING, GOD FUCKING DAMN IT, WE MADE IT!” WAS RECORDED BY THE ‘SUIT MOUNTED, RECORDER-TRANSMITTER’ THIS RECORDER AND ITS MESSAGE ARE NOW STORED AT JOHNSON ON NASA ROAD 1, HOUSTON, SEEKING FINAL DISPOSITION……..YES, I HAVE HEARD IT………LEONARD

no

This is BEYOND stupid….

Jesus fucking Christ ! did he realy say that?
what happened to one more fucking step for man? One fucking Giant leap?
How did the plug those fucking words in?

Absolutley fucking funny!!! Laughed till tears showered my face!!! My teen age boys were laughing every bit as much as me too!!! PLeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeze do another funny one!!!! Its great!!!!!
Vince

I was actually in a video editing session when the engineer wheeled around and said, “You gotta see this..”
I laughed for the rest of the night. This is HILARIOUS!!! Very basic funnybone-targeting stuff, but it’s the funniest thing I’ve seen in 2003!!!! Thanks!

holy fuck i still cant fucking believe they fucking made and fucking actually fucking walked on the fucking moon.

i think so this is not a truth video,i believe that was a lie that neil armstrong has gone to the moon.anyways that was good.

I started jerking off so hard after hearing this. I came all over my face I was so excited.

That’s FUCKING great, they talk like real FUCKING people or my name isn’t Ed (fucking) mund

Wow. You guys are really original. Even though you credited The Onion it’s pretty obvious you guys are a bunch of comedy hacks. To anyone out there reading these posts, the book is better than the rip-off sound bite.
Our Dumb Century, by the editors of The Onion.

funny

I fucking loved this!!

Holy mother of fucking God, that was fucking hilarious…

-who cares if was a fake, that was completely funny as hell, so simple, yet I cannot figure out how the hell to get the coffee out of my keyboard right now

for fucks sake!!!!!! i actually DID piss misen watching that!!! I bet Armstrongs mum is embarrassed!

muhaaaaaaaa WHERE THE **** IS HE?

Just like a bad SNL skit; 2% humor and 98% repetition. Last time saying fuck was risque in the 50’s.

Holy Fucking Christ, this is just too FUCKING funny.

We finally did it, we landed on the fucking moon. I knew we could do it. Holy Fucking Shit, we landed on the moon.

this is neil armstrong thing is pathetic. get a life!!!

Watched this after a crappy day in the office. Best thing i have seen in a while. F**king brilliant :D

what a piece of fucking crap

When I first read the Onion article about this, my GF and i laughed for hours and hours. I even bought her one of the T-Shirts that has the headline “HOLY SHIT! MAN WALKS ON FUCKING MOON!” in 72-point type. One of the funniest things Onion has ever done, and I think they’re pretty consistently funny.

Seeing this today just made it all new again. Thanks.

JESUS H. CHRIST–willya fuckin stick-up-the-ass rigid motherfuckers just relax? Yeah, find it stupid, find it crass, whatever–that’s fine. But to find it morally offensive??! Do you have THAT much fuckin time on your hands to do moral handwashing, rending of clothes, and gnashing of teeth over something that never pretended to be otherwise? Oh, wait…that’s right. We’re AMERICANS. That’s our job.
I love this fucking country…

If you are offended, then don’t listen. Or create your own ? unfunny - version. For instance, like what speechwriters came up with for Armstrong. If nothing else (you pompous, self-righteous fools), acknowledge the creative spirit of it. But if all you have is bile to spout, then it’s you wasting God’s gifts.

I love it when people say the word “fuck” over and over, I really do. I fucking love it!

would someone pls send me that cool font!

mcr

That is one fucking funny thing, copy?

Unfucking believable!

Holy shit, its the Trailer Park boys on the Moon.

Thats fucking hilarious!

Holy h christ! that sounded much more real that “one more step for man”… bullshit
lol, reafirmed my belief in the appolo space missions

Well it made me laugh out loud.

And that “Good Luck Mr Sharansky” for his last words on the moon is pretty damn funny also.

Heh. I remember reading that one of the Apollo astronauts (not Armstrong) had such an inconveniently cuss-filled vocabulary that he was required to go to psychological counseling, so as not to embarass NASA.

30 years later and NASA still cares more about image than substance. And it shows.

What a bunch of friggin losers. It’s not funny to make fun of something as important as that moon landing, and you should be ashamed of yourselves. It’s sad, really.

rofl guyz :) v funny
and unclaimed get a sence on humour!

Un****ing believable! Literally! Whilst I question the veracity of the moon landings (at least the public apollo landings) I seriously doubt that such a highly educated and intelligent man as Neil Armstrong cannot find better language to describe landing on the moon and has to rely on a stream of schoolboy expletives as heard in this obviously faked soundtrack. Come on guys, if you want to perpetrate a hoax it at least has to be believable! And this is about as believable as me trying to convince you that I am the Queen of Great Britain. Lame, very lame indeed.

I was wondering if Neil Armstrong was still living.So i went into this and found him.I was looking for you to tell you a story about my mom and brother 34 years ago.It was a good experience for my mom.If you see this well you please email me or get in touch somehow.Thank you very much.

Yours truly

Betty Mason

who the fuck reads the comments anyway? stop wasting your life!

FUCK !!

Too bad they cut the audio before Neil had the chance to say, ” Fuck! What the hell did I fucking step into? “

Also, Luke from ealier needs to get a fucking sense of humor.

Did the US ever land on the Moon ?!? Or is it a lie like the killing of J.F.K. ?!?

But this doen?t matter at all, the most IMPORTANT IS N O T TO VOTE George W. BUSH A G A I N !!!!!!!!!!!

FREEE PALESTINIA, FREE IRAQ,…!!!!!!!!

This was crap. Even insinuating,that, in their complete and total awe, the good men of Apollo 11 would use profanity when they were our nations best and brightest reminds me of the reasons our beloved country is faltering under the extreme weight of the angst and spite of the coming generations. Nothing is sacred…

This is with doubt one of the funniest things I ahve ever seen on the net. I received it a few weeks ago and just today went to the comment site. To those ass hats who take it so serious, “Neil would never use that language, blah blah blah degradation etc., BARF to you! You comments are more of a degradation to humor. Do us all a favor, get therapy. Just becasue your mummy and daddy screwed were uptight and fucked your heads up doesn’t mean you need to take it out on everyone else. I think I saw you in your pinto on the road today. You were cussing and shaking your fist. Wahhhh!!!

Funny. Hilarious even. But so very fake. Any guy on the planet could get a monotone voice and create new dialogue for that event. Still, bravo, you have made me laugh after another idiotic day has gone by.

wholey jesus h christ. thats so fuckin funny.

As a born-again christian, I am fucking horrified at this travesty.

This shit is straight garbage yo.

this is the fucking broadcast we fucking saw in fucking Canada.

this is the fucking broadcast we fucking saw in fucking Canada.

If they can put a man on the moon, how come they can’t put a man in Lifetime

(television for women) duh

I don’t believe it they’re on the fucking moon!

Thats some funny shit………..over..

Thats some funny shit………..over..

Yes sir….funny shit this is……over and out.

holy fucking jesus christ in a chicken basket…awesome

that was fucking great….did you copy that

to bad you got nothing more to do that ruin a great moment in history. shame on you. grow up you low class…………

that aint his voice and they never went to the moon. both the above statements have been proved

they never went to the moon americans are too stupid to get someone to the moon thats why they get all the european engineers to build everything for them

Hey…I thought it was funny…and I’m fucking Canadian! Has the whole f’in world lost their goddamn sense of humour?? What’s the matter with you people? Lighten Up! Keep up the good work, Gentle Folks!

Absolutely hilarious. I watched the moonwalk on a B/W tv in a laundromat. The picture was so bad, well, it resembled an MPEG!
I couldn’t tell Neil Armstrong’s foot from his helmet.

But this has had me laughing for two days. The best medicine in the world.

The only thing I can think of thta would have made it better would have been if “Armstrong” said, “You know, thirty years from now, they’ll never FUCKING believe we walked on the FUCKING moon.”

Congratulations to the writers/performers for a bit of the funniest stuff on the planet. Well done!

Absolutely hilarious. I watched the moonwalk on a B/W tv in a laundromat. The picture was so bad, well, it resembled an MPEG!
I couldn’t tell Neil Armstrong’s foot from his helmet.

But this has had me laughing for two days. The best medicine in the world.

The only thing I can think of thta would have made it better would have been if “Armstrong” said, “You know, thirty years from now, they’ll never #$@#!!! believe we walked on the @#$!!! moon.”

Congratulations to the writers/performers for a bit of the funniest stuff on the planet. Well done!

VERY FUNNY !!!

“It was better than CATS. I’ll see it again and again!”

That was some of the funniest shit EVER! I laughed my ass off at 4:50 in the morning. Rock the fuck on!!!!

To all you non humorous peope……..FUCK THE FUCK RIGHT THE FUCK OFF GOD DAMNIT! BUNCH OF FUCKERS GET A FUCKING LIFE YOU JACK ASSES!!!! FOR FUCK SAKE!

Heh, too bad we never landed on the moon in the late 60’s…several things prove this…

In the footage of Neil landing on the moon, the US flag is WAVING in the background…this is not possible due to the vacuum in space…also the dust that the moon buggy creates falls back down to the moon at a very false rate, and one more thing…the lunar module that they used to land on the moon was captured taking off and heading back to earth from location on the moon, who shot this footage?

We might have landed on the moon after apollo 13, but the US was so pressed to compete with the Soviets by putting the first man in space, creating the first satellite, and other things…that we just had to show them that we were far more advanced…and to do so, we rented out a hollywood studio and filmed neil jumping up and down on a dirt lot with an american flag waving in the background.

As far as I see this wasn’t any grandious historical event…it was a complete lie and coverup by the US government.

Our technology today is even faulty…look at the Mars landing project back in the 90’s…some idiot programmed the decent in feet, and the lander in meters…result? The entire project ruined b/c the lander smacked Mars before it was programmed to prepare itself for final decent. Therefore, our technology back in the 60’s would have been severely lacking in order to create a program such as the apollo missions, and have a successful landing on the moon.

This clip was edited for comical purposes…we never landed on the moon in 1969, so why even bother complaining about a couple of people who were bored enough to create something like this…

I’ve seen and heard many funny things on the net and I can honestly say that this was not one of them. What a total load of bollocks

That was fucking funny …

That is FUCKING hilarious. lol on the motherfucking moon. goddamn thats priceless

fuckin FUNNY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

PRETTY THAM GOOD, FUNNY TOO, WILL PASS
IT ON AND THANKS.

RIGHT FUCKIN ON ARMSTRONG!!!!! tHIS IS JUST TO FUNNY

fucking hilarious!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

oh yeah? well, i farted!

the truth? lol yeah right like someones gonna buy this

precious, its only a fucking jock folks, what the fuck, he landed on the fucking moon for fucks sake, isn’t fucking incredible

Mostly harmless. Abso-fucking-lutely hilarious. I laughed so hard that I got a warm feeling in my pants. And hey, some of you need to get unplug your heads from your arses. Use your noggin! You can damned well bet any military man (which most of the autronauts were/are) would let slip a few FUCKs upon stepping upon the fucking surface of the fucking moon. Sweet Jesus’ titties!!

Now that’s fucking funny.

i would love to know what he said when he got back fucking home

not really that funny, kind of like SNL …. sometimes would be funny if not long drawn out and painstakingly obvious over and over and over again. Just another wasted space on the net.

Well shit ,christ ,howdy! That’s what most people whould have said; Imean hey I’m on the fucking moon!!! k.Davis NASAlabs

I couldn’t agree mr. Davis

What the fuck was that all about?

That sounds more beleaveable than ( One step of man

pretty damn good gang; way to go!!

it’s a kick in the ass of the american pride (at least, for those who believe in this “movie”)… oh, by the way, i’m pretty shure that armstrong would use the good name of the Lord so get real… we are not puritains

It’s a fucking joke,okay? He didn’t really say that, but it’s fucking hilarious nonetheless. And of course it’s fake, houston kinda sounds like Steve Martin.

Mwahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Too funny! That’s more like what any normal person would have said when they were on the moon. I know I’d be swearing too if I was actually on the moon! haha! Thanks for the lauph!

I’m not amused.

love to see the video, but it’s not playing on netscape 6 or explorer 5. how come?

It should do - it plays for me IE6, Mozilla, Mozilla Firebird & Opera… have you got the Flash 6 player installed?

You can’t fool me! This was filmed in the western desert. COMPLETELY FALSE AND BOGUS!!!

I think it’s disgraceful that professionals such as Astronauts can allow themselves to use such disgusting language. Don’t they realise that young children were watching this broadcast. I say thank god for editors, they do a marvelous job for this country.

so fucken what!

Re question herald - Tribune / Sunday Aug 31 2003

Should humanity boldly fling itself towards the stars, Or send up unmanned vehicle to do the job ?

If you have an open mind and are willing to review material I can give you the only answer to the question that exists at this time. Our ability to go into deep space is limited to “unmanned vehicles.” When president Kennedy set the goal of the Moon landings he was not aware we were not able to pass through the Van Allen radiation belt without heavy shielding to protect the fliers.
Once those in charge realized the feat was impossible it was decided to fool the Soviet government into thinking we were further along in the space race than they. Its impossible to fool the perceived enemy without hiding the true facts from the American public. Langley Air force base was used to build the mockups and props used to make the photos.
Prior to his departure from Eastern Airlines I had the opportunity to discuss the landings with Frank Borman who was alleged to have made the first trip around the Moon. Because of the inconsistent and evasive answers and his statement the landing was watched by two UFOs sitting on the far wall of the canyon. I knew this gentleman had never made a trip beyond Earths orbits. I have spent time at the space port and long ago concluded the Apollo program was faked. The Fox network made a documentary ” Did we go to the Moon ? ” exposing the sham perpetrated on the public using material from men who worked on the program and photos from NASAs own files. Not once when giving the opportunity to refute the evidence did NASA give a straight answer but simplify attacked the messenger. [ Never A Straight Answer.]
Instead they have relied on Professor Steven Dutch, University of Wisconsin to debunk the aired Fox documentary using pseudo science. IE. flag waves because of no air to impede the movement when astronaut attempts to plant it in ground, simple inertia. when actually a review ot the film clearly reveals the flag was placed in to a pipe driven into the Moons surface by the Astronaut bounding towards the camera. Also his explanation why shadows are going in 90 degree directions. ” Because of perspective and uneven surfaces” His entire debunking is nothing but smoke and mirrors.
A second documentary never aired ” We never went to the Moon “by Bill Kaysenger is available and presents similar material. However a third documentary by a Investigative reporter and film maker Bart Sibrel Is available. Sibrels many requests to NASA and personal research of its files for any unedited photos and material resulted in someone making a mistake and sending a miss marked tape that was never intended to be shown to the public showing the Apollo 11 crew faking the mission to the moon. See “afunnythinghappenedonthewaytothemoon.com.”
Of all the mysteries confronting mankind’s quest for knowledge, the greatest is the mystery called life. The theory of evolution explains how life on earth evolved From one cell creatures to Homo Sapiens, it does not explain life on earth began. Are we alone, is life on Earth unique. This answer will evade us until we explore the vast reaches of the universe and this can only be accomplished at the present time with un manned vehicles.

Young lady My name is John M Burch Ph 863 9931357 P O box 101 Arcadia fla 34265
If after reviewing the tapes you open the following web site you can see where the 40 billion dollar movie was made.

http://www.geocities.com/fakemoonpics/ Robert Anton Wilson

If you are interested in learning the truth I’m sending via snail mail these tapes plus the audio tape of the interview by Barbara Simpson with Bart Sibrel, If you view them I will discuss your findings at your convince. If you elect to view the audio and video tapes please review the following explanations given by professor Steven Dutch on behalf of NASA and note the comments I’ve made. Ill attach it below. Thank you for your time. Incidentally im 72 yrs old, served in the Marine corps, Korea. and if you think the young Army lady who is being used as a propaganda tool did anything to win the bronze star medal than many of my friends who gave their all to win the bronze star are going to turn over in their graves.
Question Why does a supposable free press publish this propaganda ???

Subject: Moon landing debunked

Theory: Did We Go to the Moon?
Steven Dutch, Natural and Applied Sciences, University of Wisconsin - Green Bay
First-time Visitors: Please visit Site Map and Disclaimer. Use “Back” to return here.

This page is based on a television special, Conspiracy Theory: Did We Go to the Moon? produced by Bruce Nash and aired on the Fox Network in March, 2001.

A Note to Visitors
I will respond to questions and comments as time permits, but if you want to take issue with any position expressed here, you first have to answer this question:

What evidence would it take (available now on earth) to prove we really went to the Moon?

Comment = A straight answer covering all issues raised by the FOX documentary and a logical explanation of Bart Sibrels film ” A funny thing happened on the way to the Moon” Showing NASAs dated / timed footage showing the flyers faking the trip that prove we did not go to the moon . There is no evidence available now on earth proving we went to the moon because a real scientific examination will prove we did not . I will compare your pseudo scientific explanations with the footage which will show you did not review the tapes when you fabricated your pseudo scientific answers.

The Cast

Arguing for various aspects of the conspiracy theory were Bill Kaysing, described as an engineer and analyst for Rocketdyne, Brian O’Leary, a “NASA astronaut in the 1960’s”, Paul Lazarus, a producer, Ralph Rene, “Author/Scientist”, Bart Sibrel, “Investigative Journalist”, Jan Lundberg, described as a technician for Hasselblad, Donald Percey of the “Royal Photographic Society” and Howard McCurdy, “space historian at American University.” Counterarguments were supplied by former NASA spokesman Julian Scheer and Paul Field, NASA LEM specialist. Some of the claims made in the program are discussed below, followed by a few topics not addressed in the program.

Up to 20% of the American Public Believes We Did Not Go To The Moon
There is no idea on God’s green earth so dumb that you can’t get a big chunk of the American public to buy it. These are the same people who believe you can cut taxes but expand services, and who believe you can extract oil from the ground indefinitely without running out of it.

And if 20% believe we didn’t go to the moon, that means 80% do, right? Why are the 20% more worthy of being taken seriously than the 80%?

Comment - Statements intended to intimidate those who disagree are not scientific but pseudo scientific tactics used by debunkers to intimidate those who disagree. 80% as apposed to 20% is not a scientific approach to a correct conclusion.

Pseudo - sham; false; spurious; pretended; counterfeit; one who affects being an intellectual

No Stars Are Visible

The Apollo astronauts all landed on the day side of the moon, and all the videos they shot from orbit were over the day side, so the exposure settings were all for daylight. Set your camera to 1/125 at f/8 (a setting typical of the slower films in use in 1969). Aim it at the night sky and shoot pictures. Tell me how many stars you see. Aim your camcorder at the sky and see how many stars you can film.

Even with the eye you’d have difficulty seeing stars from the daytime lunar surface unless you stood in a shadow and shielded yourself from any light reflected from the ground, for the same reason you can’t see stars from a brightly lit parking lot at night.

Comment - Correct, with out a resetting of the cameras lens the stars probably would not be visible but with the once in a life time opportunity why wasn’t the camera reset and the stars photographed ?

The Flag Waves
Sure it does. The flag had a stiffening rod on the upper side so it would stand out from the staff. When the astronauts moved the pole, the free corner lagged behind by simple inertia. The flag actually flops unnaturally quickly because there is no air resistance to impede it.

Comment - this statement was made either without reviewing the Fox documentary or without regards to the truth, FOX footage 0;9,40 minutes clearly shows the astronaut driving a pipe into the ground into which the flag is inserted as one astronaut bounds towards the camera. The flag is clearly moved by a outside force. Fast forward to 0:18,15. the flag moves 90% back and forth. a still frame one at a time review clearly indicates wind movement and again at 0:21,40 minutes. While reviewing the Bart Sibrel document “A funny thing happened on the way to the moon”at the 0;30,00 footage the flag is clearly whipped back and forth, the astronauts range of motion is limited by his pressurized suit and a 90% movement would require him to extend his elbow away from his body, not just hand movement. Move forward to 0:31,09 [ Sibel tape] the flag moves while the astronaut moves from the end of the flag to the pole end with no hands on it, Inertia = tendency for matter to remain at rest unless affected by some outside force. In this case wind.

No Dust on the Lander Footpads
Dust on the airless moon won’t behave like dust on the earth. It won’t hang in suspension. Even the tiniest dust particle will travel a ballistic path like a thrown baseball. So any dust kicked up by the landing will fly away from the Lander and fall to the surface some distance away.

When the astronauts walk, the dust they kick up doesn’t hang in a cloud but plummets like a stone - literally. There’s no air to keep it suspended.

Comment - This is distorted facts. At 0;10,00 footage the astronaut clearly states Moon looks like “much of the high desert of the United States” fast fwd to 0:15,00 footage and he states “surface is very fine grained almost like a powder” a fine grained powder would not take a ballistic path away from the Lander but move in all directions and much would settle onto the landing pads and a blast crater would clearly visible under the Lander.

No Engine Noise is Audible

None is audible on transcripts of Space Shuttle launches, either. Nor do you hear engine noise when an airline pilot speaks over the loudspeaker, even though it’s plainly audible in the passenger compartment. The blast noise goes mostly out and back. The proximity of the microphone to the speaker’s mouth means that voice will drown out whatever engine noise there is.

Comment- Although you clearly hear the pilots voice because the mike is directly in front of his mouth the engine noise is clearly audible at take off with full power applied. jet engine noise is much lower than the noise of a rocket, the interior is heavily insulated and all aircraft are now required to have engine noise suppressors installed. Note during the decent of the LEM at 0:13,00 footage. the tape is completely silent of all exterior noise in a vehicle where weight is so critical minimal insulation was use

Temperature Contrasts
One criticism of the Apollo landings was that no provision was made for the huge temperature contrasts between the sunlit and shaded areas on the Moon.

I could scarcely believe that anybody who claimed to have an engineering background would confuse temperature and heat, but that’s what happened in the program. Temperature is how fast atoms are moving in a material. Heat is how much total energy those atoms have. You can stick your hand in a 500-degree oven without injury, but touch any solid object in the oven and you’ll burn. Everything has the same temperature, but the amount of heat in the air isn’t enough to burn you quickly, whereas the amount in the grill or pan will be.

Comment- “I could scarcely believe that anybody who claimed to have an engineering background” ect ect. Lets ridicule and distort anyone who would disagree with a Science Professor.The above contains some science, much distortion. Film did not rely on temperature to reach the conclusion the landings were faked. The professor laments to a great degree on a subject that’s hardly touched on in the documentary. But refutes the flag waving in less than two lines. A NASA discrepancy clearly visible through out the film.

Lighting and Shadow Discrepancies
There’s a slight difference between being in a shadow and in front of one. Some of the Apollo photographs were criticized for showing brightly-illuminated astronauts in the shadow of the spacecraft, but it’s clear the sun was shining obliquely in the scene, and the astronauts were above or in front of the shadow.

One celebrated picture shows an astronaut with the sun behind him, and the lunar lander and American flag reflected in his visor. According to critics, the astronaut should have been merely a silhouette. And so he should, if he weren’t surrounded by brightly-lit ground. If the full moon can brightly illuminate the earth from 250,000 miles away, just imagine what it can do to an astronaut standing on it.

A number of photos show what are claimed to be shadows pointing in different directions. But the comparison is between well-defined shadows in the foreground and very oblique shadows in the background. Shadows lie on parallel lines pointing away from the sun. Because of perspective, they will appear to radiate away from the point on the horizon directly under the sun. It’s simply incredible that people who claimed to have backgrounds in photography and engineering would not know this. Close examination shows that the apparently mismatched shadows are also being cast on uneven surfaces. For example, one rock is clearly higher than the surface where its shadow falls. Between perspective, uneven surfaces, and no attempt whatever to find the real explanation, there’s no mystery whatever about the “mismatched” shadows.

A brief look around outdoors on a sunny day will show that shadows of nearby objects do not line up with more distant ones, or even point directly away from the sun. The reason is that you don’t line up the base of the object with its shadow, as was done in the program. You draw a line from a point on the edge of the shadow through the object that casts that part of the shadow. So it’s simply ridiculous to draw lines from the base of the Lunar Module through its shadow. To see if the shadows were consistent, you’d have to draw lines from objects on the Lunar Module to their corresponding shadows. These lines should converge on the Sun.

The most preposterous argument involves photos taken on Apollo 17 at the base of the lunar Apennines. The background, it is claimed, is faked because one photo of the mountains shows the Lunar Module in the picture and another showing the same mountains does not. Here’s a simple exercise. Drive to Mount Rushmore, Yosemite, or some other scenic spot. Park at a scenic overlook. Take a picture with your car in the foreground. Now walk around your car and take another picture. Compare the distant backdrop in the two pictures.

Comment- ” A brief look around outdoors on a sunny day will show that shadows ” ect Much distorted science. Lighting by sun light would be consistent through out film but some shadowed areas are pitch black while others are clearly illuminated check 0:19,15 0:24,15 minutes of film. Astronauts are clearly in shadow not above or in front. Moon light on earth is very consistent when you are outside and although a full moon will illuminate the surroundings clearly, it is difficult to distinguish colors.

“is faked because one photo” ect “So its simply ridiculous to draw lines” Lighting discrepancies occur through out the film. 0;23,10 clearly show [closely] related shadows running at angles inconsistent with shadows cast by sun light, in addition the sun will not create hot spots on the ground and else where.

Lets start by saying “The most preposterous argument involves photos “ect ect ect To intimidate those who disagree. Different backgrounds are now explained away with fake science. Take a photo on a scenic spot on a overlook, walk around car but not to far remember you are on a scenic overlook and yes the back ground will be almost the same.. Check footage at 0:26,10 the LEM is off in the distance. Now move to the far side of the Lander and compare the photos. they would be different and will not match.

Doctored Photos?

One sequence in the program quite convincingly shows that two scenes supposedly filmed on different days at different locations were actually filmed at the same spot. Maybe this proves the missions were filmed on earth on a set. Or maybe it merely shows that whoever edited the film mixed up the footage.

Another couple of photos shows that crosshairs etched on the camera lens appear to be behind objects in the foreground. There’s no question about it - the crosshairs disappear abruptly at the edge of the objects. One in particular appears to be in front of the American flag but behind an astronaut’s arm.

Now this makes absolutely no sense at all from a conspiracy viewpoint. If you’re going to stage the landings on earth, why put crosshairs on the camera at all? If we assume the photos were shot with the calibrated cameras that would have gone to the moon, and NASA went to the time and trouble to build stage sets and have people in spacesuits act out the landings, why not just shoot the scenes you need? Cutting and pasting makes no sense at all - nobody would have missed the apparently doctored shots if they weren’t made.

On the other hand, somebody editing out distracting crosshairs for press release makes perfect sense and is just as consistent with all the data. The question is, what’s on the original film? And none of the conspiracy theorists have apparently bothered to find out.

And there’s another possible explanation. I examined a scene of the Apollo 15 landing, showing commander James Irwin, the Lunar Module, and the Lunar Rover. Crosshairs are visible against lunar mountains in the background. They are also visible against footprints in the foreground. I can see shooting the scene against a backdrop, but how did crosshairs get in the foreground? But what really gives the game away is the crosshair against the Lunar Module. The crosshair is located on a set of panels sloping at various angles to the sun. The obliquely-lit panels, which are light gray, show the crosshair faintly. The crosshair is invisible against a panel that shows bright white because it is more directly lit by the sun. Both of the examples of allegedly obstructed crosshairs shown in the program were against white objects. So it is very possible there was no editing at all, merely the well known photographic effect that thin dark lines disappear when photographed against very bright backgrounds.

Comment - a more plausible explanation is the manufacture of the camera was not privy to the deception. If you taped a cross hair onto a brightly lit object the cross hair would probably be washed out by the surrounding glare. but the crosshair is inside the camera and would be visible unless eliminated by combining two photos to create a fake scene. “On the other hand, somebody editing out distracting crosshairs for press release makes perfect sense and is just as consistent with all the data. The question is, what’s on the original film? And none of the conspiracy theorists have apparently bothered to find out.” Why not edit out all the distracting cross hairs for press release if it makes sense to a debunker? “The question is, what’s on the original film?”The documentary was made from film received from NASA on many requests. all film obtained from NASA was closely edited prior to release and no live feed was permitted for television. One investigative reporter made three different requests for all Apollo 11 photos and related material and conducted a search of NASAs archives. The third request resulted in proof the landings were faked. By mistake a mislabeled tape was sent to Bart Sibrel and is the centerpiece of his documentary “A funny thing happened on the way to the Moon” I became aware of its existence after listening to his interview with Barbara Simpson on the cost to cost AM radio show on March 31 2001.

Because there is no fluffy, easily mobilized dust on the Moon. There never was, except in the imaginations of a few fiction science writers. Certainly since the Surveyor missions of the late 1960’s, it was known for certain that the Moon’s surface was fairly firm, well-packed material. Pictures of the blast effects would be useful from both an engineering and scientific standpoint, but nobody was surprised by the absence of a blast crater.

The film shows an artist’s (Norman Rockwell’s) conception with a blast crater visible under the LEM, but a public relations artist is not a scientist

Comment - Dust on the Moon [ True Norman Rockwell is not a scientist but one of the most famous folk artist in the world. All his paintings are realistic because his
research is accurate down to a T. the information used in the painting
was supplied by NASA.]

A lot of the confusion about lunar dust seems to arise from people thinking of household dust. Household dust is mostly organic (a lot of it is dead skin). It has a low density and floats easily in the air. Lunar dust is powdered rock, much higher in density and with no air to support it. There are no dust bunnies on the moon.

Kick any dry, bare ground surface on earth and you will kick up rock dust. Kick the moon and you will kick up lunar dust. Both kinds of dust are powdered rock, different origins but with somewhat similar properties. Rock dust is pretty cohesive once it packs down. One reader sent in a picture of the Lunar Rover churning up dust and asked how this could happen if there is no dust on the moon. Same way an ATV in a gravel pit kicks up dust. Nobody ever said there is “no dust” on the moon, just no fluffy, easily mobilized dust.

Once the lunar Lander rockets blew away the near-surface dust, what’s left? Larger particles too big to move easily.

Comment -” A lot of confusion about lunar dust seems to arise from people thinking of household dust” ect The professors speculation is totally ridicules, no one expected dust bunnies on the moon. NASAs film clearly show foot prints extremely legible in soil that contains moisture or has the consistency of flour. “Once the lunar Lander rockets blew away the near-surface dust, what’s left? Larger particles too big to move easily”Fox film at 0:15,00 footage “Surface is fine grained, almost like a powder.” If this statement was true “large particles” How can the Lander be surrounded by footprints through-out the documentary that was made using NASAs film

The Radiation Belts

Supposedly, travel to the moon is impossible because of the Van Allen radiation belts. So who better than Van Allen himself to describe the hazards (of course, he’s part of the plot too!)

The Van Allen Belts are zones where particles from the sun are trapped by the earth’s magnetic field. In a 1960 paper, On the Radiation Hazards of Space Flight, Van Allen describes the belts and their hazards. The belts vary greatly in extent and radiation depending on solar activity, but generally there is an inner, energetic belt mostly at low latitudes between about 2000 and 4000 kilometers and an outer, less energetic belt between about 13,000 and 20,000 kilometers above the earth. The belts carry a radiation dose of about 20 roentgens (grays in modern units) per hour and the gap in between about one. These figures are for spacecraft shielded by about 4 mm of aluminum (one gram per square centimeter).

(Note: dosimetry is a complex issue and there are several types of units - roentgens, rems, rads, and grays - that measure different things, but they turn out to be roughly equivalent when applied to human exposure. On the other hand, if you know enough about dosimetry to care, then you should know enough to refute the Van Allen Belt argument. If you still believe the conspiracy theory, shame on you.)

Assuming, then, that we shoot the Apollo capsule straight through the belts at escape velocity (40,000 km/hour), we’re talking 0.05 hours in the inner belt, 0.225 hours in the gap and 0.175 hours in the outer belt. That means a total dose of (20 x 0.05) + (.225 x 1) + (20 x 0.175) = 4.7 roentgens, or about 1% of the fatal radiation dose. Double this figure for the round trip. Once beyond the belts the radiation hazard becomes small.

Although ten roentgens is far below the lethal dose, it poses significant long-term health hazards and nowadays is considered a wholly unacceptable dosage. There are two ways to reduce the risk. First, since the inner belt is largely confined to within 30 degrees of the equator, launch into an orbit inclined at least 30 degrees to the equator and then launch into a lunar trajectory above or below the inner belt.

Second, the energy distribution of the particles in the inner and outer belt is quite different. Changing our 4 mm of aluminum to lead would have only marginal effects in reducing dosage in the inner belt, but it cuts the dosage in the outer belt by a factor of 500. Also, the outer belt is still most intense at low latitudes and the spacecraft trajectory can be aimed to minimize radiation exposure in the outer belt.

According to NASA, none of the Apollo missions exceeded one roentgen of total dosage.

Comment- If the above statements were anything other than smoke and mirror, pseudo scientific explanations. Than why? As reported by CNN in 1998 when the Shuttle flew to its highest orbit of 350 miles was NASA totally surprised by the astronauts reporting bright flashes of light going through their heads even with their ryes closed. CNN reported “NASAs unpredicted surprise and said the Van Allen belt can create killer electrons that could adversely affect the Astronauts health”

To continue commenting on professor Dutches flim flam tale is a waste of time.

12 / 30 / 2002 Apollo fake. By Robert Anton Wilson Its clear Mr. Wilson has done his home work and its inconceivable that anyone with an open mind can’t see we were victims of a hoax. Myself, Jim Marrs, and 80% of the American people. Anyone with doubts should click on Did we go to the moon, scroll down to “A funny thing happened on the way to the Moon” purchase the tape showing NASAs time,dated footage of the astronauts faking the trip.

The Remainder of the learnered Professors term paper is pure science fiction. Be aware many in the scientific community will lower their standards when seeking a Federal grant to work on some personal project.

I can’t fucking believe it! Holey shit!

Jesus H. Christ in a chicken basket!

…I crap my pants when I was laughing so hard I farted….and then laughed some more because my co-workers were with me and heard it…errr…me…and…well…fucking a….all is right in the world…

I was 13 years when I got up at 3:am to watch the first lift off! I was so excited! Oh my fucking heart, if this is real, I think Mr Armstrong WOULD say the word FUCK, and everbody else, in thier excitement, many, many times. Thank you for the enlightenment.

I laughed. I cried. I pissed my fucking pants! Then I went to clean myself up…but I was still fucking laughing! Very creative and actually likely. Very nice job.

“Jesus Fucking Christ” But, The only problem is……….
“They never landed on the Fucking Moon”

Like they really even landed on the fucking moon to begin with. It looks like neil should have won an oscar for his fucking pathetic moon acting at area 57! What the hell happened to that fucking Armstrong antway? Should’nt he have had a kid the od(d) or be on a stamp, or running for office somewhere (CA.) It’s all fucking bullshit. I George Sexton have been to the moon I fucking know!!!!!!!

The only thing that gave me a bigger smile was the comments!! Can we be more Dramatic in our shocking use of the word
F U C K I N G ?… lol
Ya know…….. (whispers)… I bet that word did come outta his mouth at the wonderious site !!!

I have no problem with vulgarity when it’s appropriate. This was mildly amusing for the first two or three seconds. Beyond that it’s pretty lame, and the ebullient comments to the contrary are just sad.

hehe

Love it - I guess there was truth in the 60’s too bad about the filter cops

wonderfull

Re: “Neil Armstrong The Awful Truth” - It is obvious that there are people out there who have loads of free time. Notwithstanding the other positive comments, this isn’t funny - it’s stupid.

this is fucking funny!!!!!

Jesus H. Crist on a bicycle! Isn’t that a microphone hanging down in the upper left corner, about eight seconds into the piece?

Fucking moon, fuckinggg moon…fucckkkiiingg moon,
fuck you Armstrong, don’t be fool fucker!

WHOEVER MADE THIS UP MUST BE THE MOST PATHETIC LOSER. This wasn’t the least bit funny.

You are absa-fuckin-lutely fulla shit!!!

hey all you dumbasses who don’t realize it’s a JOKE. Get a life - this is fucking hilarious - of COURSE it’s not real you idiots!

where the fuck is my last post? did it go into the fucking chicken basket? lol

What are you talking about

jesus christ, the biggest load of bull. and there wos me thinkin it wos a hoax now where wud i hav evea got that from?!?!:P nah its so obvious it aint real, look at the shadows of the rocks, they all go in different directions when the only light source in space is the sun….

I don’t know about anyone else but, totally awesome! I just couldn’t believe it! Jesus H. Christ in a handbasket! LOL

I bow down to the fucking MASTER!

Jesus H. Christ in a chicken basket. Fuckin’ A.

JESUS CHRIST THAT’S FUNNY !! DO YOU THINK THEY TWISTED UP A DOOB WHEN THEY GOT BACK INTO THE LUNAR MODULE ?

I can not believe you think this is real. My husband has work for nasa for years, and that never would of been said.

I LOVE this…and what’s more…when I was married to one of the orignal engineers on Von Braun’s team at NASA in Huntsville, Alabama there were tapes he brought home where we could listen to REAL dialogue from the astronauts during flight. I recall the flap over their being given that powdered, fake orange juice that gave them the farts. They complained about that loud, long and painfully. Can I say “fart”?? It did make us laugh like crazy. And to think…that shit’s still on the market!! So…..I can easiy believe THIS to be real. hee hee

That was the stupiest thing I’ve ever seen. ya’ll are a bunch of losers and retards. get a job freaks

y’all are nerds. can we be friends?

Unbefuckinglieable!!!!!!b That is one of the funniest fucking things I have ever heard on here!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA Unfukinbelieveable! HAAAAAAA hahahahahahaha

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA Unfukinbelieveable! HAAAAAAA hahahahahahaha

Now THAT is the funniest god-damned thing I’ve ever seen on the internet. You win, we’re all packing it in and going home:)

Hoooorah!!!!!!!!!!!! I believe, Fuck You, you straight laced, tightass shitbirds. Lighten up. Have some fun. A smile won’t break you face. What do you think he said, ” lets put a motel over there, and a gas & go over there” ? I would have said, this place needs a good shitter.

holy fuckin shit.. I cant believe you fucking put that fucking thing on the fucking internet.

OMG! Everyone here at the One Tree Hill production office has been snickering all FUCKIN’ day at this! VERY FUNNY STUFF!!
I know if I was on the moon… I would be saying the same!!
-BK

wot a crock load off shit
you guys need to grow up

UN-Believable

Neil: Ah, jesus…tap dancing christ.. the moon.

Control: Ah…………roger.

Y’ know it’s not true all of this about being on the moon. The solar system is 2 big to be on the moon. There could be other universes. All you people getting excited because he was on the moon. The moon is nothing to anyone know. Why don’t you travel space instead of finding a thew crates on the moon and a bit of water on mars, start been a bit adventures please, the world needs cheering up a little, Good Luck!